Originally Posted by Dude
I'm not sure where you missed the part where student loans are not dischargeable debt. http://www.finaid.org/questions/bankruptcyexception.phtml
But they are "forgiveable". Banks cannot compete with a lender that will forgive debt for political reasons. The overall cost of this loan forgiveness concerns me, and I am further irked by the special treatment of people working for the government and for non-profits (forgiveness after 10 years of payments, vs. 20 years for other people), as if the former group were more noble.

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303887804579503894256072308
Student-Debt Forgiveness Plans Skyrocket, Raising Fears Over Costs, Higher Tuition
By JOSH MITCHELL CONNECT
Wall Street Journal
April 22, 2014 5:56 p.m. ET

Quote
Government officials are trying to rein in increasingly popular federal programs that forgive some student debt, amid rising concerns over the plans' costs and the possibility they could encourage colleges to push tuition even higher.

Enrollment in the plans—which allow students to rack up big debts and then forgive the unpaid balance after a set period—has surged nearly 40% in just six months, to include at least 1.3 million Americans owing around $72 billion, U.S. Education Department records show.

The popularity of the programs comes as top law schools are now advertising their own plans that offer to cover a graduate's federal loan repayments until outstanding debt is forgiven. The school aid opens the way for free or greatly subsidized degrees at taxpayer expense.

At issue are two federal loan repayment plans created by Congress, originally to help students with big debt loads and to promote work in lower-paying jobs outside the private sector.

The fastest-growing plan, revamped by President Barack Obama in 2011, requires borrowers to pay 10% a year of their discretionary income—annual income above 150% of the poverty level—in monthly installments. Under the plan, the unpaid balances for those working in the public sector or for nonprofits are then forgiven after 10 years.

Private-sector workers also see their debts wiped clean—after a longer period of 20 years—reflecting a government aim to have no one, wherever they work, paying down student debt their entire working life.


An independent study estimates the future cost of the 2011 program, known as Pay As You Earn, could hit $14 billion a year.

The Obama administration has proposed in its latest budget released last month to cap debt eligible for forgiveness at $57,500 per student. There is currently no limit on such debt.

http://www.nationalreview.com/phi-b...oy-keep-college-bubble-going-george-leef
“Pay As You Earn” -- A Ploy to Keep the College Bubble Going
By George Leef
National Review
April 24, 2014 9:00 AM

Quote
Today’s Wall Street Journal has a good editorial on the Obama administration’s “Pay As You Earn” program, which is designed to help college students (and also those seeking higher degrees, such as JDs) by allowing many of them to off-load some of their debts. This will probably buy some votes and undoubtedly help to keep the higher ed bubble inflated for a while longer. Especially disturbing is the way the program lures students into “public service” work so they can escape more of their debt. The editorial correctly notes, “impressionable youngsters, who likely have little or no wealth, are being given an enormous financial incentive to pursue careers in government or low-paying nonprofits.”

This is yet another good reason why we should never have gotten into federal student aid in the first place.

The WSJ Editorial is "Telling Students to Earn Less" http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304279904579517934206301354 .

Last edited by Bostonian; 04/24/14 07:26 AM. Reason: added title of WSJ editorial