Originally Posted by George C
How interesting that Val used PG and HG+ as synonyms in that post you just quoted.
LOL, I also use the term HG+, and will continue to do so in some contexts and for reasons such as:
- being inclusive,
- being modest and/or anonymous about one's own children's LOG,
- not recalling a detail...

Originally Posted by George C
Were you planning on calling out Val for that? Also, look way back on this thread. You'll see at least one other poster who has done the same thing. Don't forget to call them out, too.
As previously noted, the thread wanders from discussing definitions of gifted, to Profoundly Gifted (PG), to twice-exceptional (2e). Way back on the thread, the discussion was not focused on DYS qualification criteria. Yesterday, I sought clarification of your use of HG+ specifically in the context of discussing DYS qualification criteria.