Originally Posted by indigo
Originally Posted by aquinas
Originally Posted by indigo
Originally Posted by Dude
At no point did anyone make the argument that any one individual should have a guaranteed right to a publicly-financed secondary education.
That's what I understood to be aquinas' expressed view, here, as a Canadian inquiring whether there is universal aid for college tuition in the US.
No, I've suggested there is a range that exists in which it is fiscally neutral to provide public funding for some students' post-secondary education. Universal aid for college tuition is quite a departure from that.
I believe you have said both...

Originally Posted by aquinas
(I may be unaware of the specifics of tuition aid in the US. If it is universal, please disregard.)
Originally Posted by aquinas
There exists a spectrum of expenditure options which can, on a publicly revenue-neutral basis, provide some financial offset for the costs of post-secondary education for those who need it most.

It's funny. You seem to be suggesting that you know my perspective better than I do. Why is that?

The first is a question. The second is a statement of fact. The two are not incompatible.

What is to give light must endure burning.