I meant the if I said my child was ASD without a test confirming so, and have advice about it, I'd say people whose child actually is ASD would be offended.

I know that there is one poster here whose child has tested as only about e average on at least two IQ tests still persists to call their child PG. I'm not saying there is a flat out score, but the general score is 145+, in the least. I prefer HG+. Why the desparate need to refer to a child as PG without quantifiable evidence? Why not just say "gifted" or "suspected gifted"? Why the need to way specifically PG to strangers on a forum outside of an educational setting? Kids are so different. It's perfectly possible for a child to achieve PG things without being PG.

Val is so right about the confirmation bias. People try to make the data fit the theory, rather than make a theory that fit the data.