It seems a bit weightist or pachydermist, but wotthehey. You can't please everyone. A likely interpretation (by someone who's not overly touchy) is that you are put out when someone suggests that your child's abilities are solely the results of training-- as if hothousing could create an ultrabright! Viscosity's low on this one.
I agree with Val. The standard of acceptable speech here is not whether at least one out of a range of possible interpretations could theoretically offend someone, is it? Your signature's fine.
_____
Putting a sleight-of-hand artist in a cemetery doesn't make him a necromancer.
Alright, Iucounu! Your "new siggy" is really too much. As the daugher of an undertaker, I'm offended.
*wink*
