Bostonian: That article is just plain awful, so maybe you want to find another that states your case better. The paragraph you clipped shows how the author made an unjustified leap into SAT=IQ with no supporting data whatsoever. He didn't even bother with the 2003 statistics.

The article may be from 2014, but what year did Gardner make that original statement? No citation, I see.

Meanwhile, you still haven't addressed why good high schools and extensive test prep equals improved SAT scores but no change in fluid intelligence.