Originally Posted by 22B
Originally Posted by 22B
It's the difference between some and none.
I'll expand on my logic here. In the OP Marnie's case, there were arguably some legitimate reason's to exclude a 4 year old (as many posters pointed out), whereas in contrast, in stefgray's case, there were unarguably no legitimate reason's to exclude a 4 year old.

I totally understand. We've had many of those situations as well but I chose to share one where really it was apples and oranges. Sorry guys. Didn't mean to sound like I was making light of the dilemma both teachers and parents find themselves in. Sorry.