Yeah-- I definitely get that.
I'm still not sure that anyone associated IS clear on the fact that she's technically a QID.
So they may well base selection off of the information and not even understand that it SHOULD NOT be used that way.
The reason why I wonder if it is worth bringing up is that there is a central clearinghouse which acts as a go-between between applicants and those who will interview/hire. The go-between level is where the questions were coming from.
So there is still a chance (potentially-- not sure?) that the information has not yet gone to the hiring/interviewing personnel. If it does, then "disability" needs to be attached to that information, IMO. If it doesn't, then it's all fine either way.
Doesn't really sound like there is any good way of bringing it up, though.
I'm with Val here-- that phone call really places everyone involved into an awkward situation.
