Gifted Issues Discussion homepage Forums Active Threads

xdarkroastx,

Having been on both sides of the table in this type of conversation, I understand both the frustration and the constraints. (Actually, I've been an advocate for acceleration on the school-based team side of the conversation, too.) One of the challenges on the school resource side is that the teachers who are excited about his gifts and interest in numbers -and- have the skills to differentiate/accelerate instruction for him are not as plentiful as one might think. His existing teacher sounds delightful and caring, but may or may not truly be equipped to keep pace with your DC's needs in math instruction.

A possible direction that may cost the district money (or not, depending on what they already have), but would not require a teacher, is a self-paced online platform such as ALEKS, which has instructional modules embedded in it, is self-leveling (through benchmark testing at the beginning, and ongoing adaptive assessment), and includes content from kindergarten through calculus. (ALEKS Adventure is more elementary-appropriate in its aesthetic and format, but only goes through 5th grade--which might still be useful to your DC for a little bit, while the main ALEKS package is grade 3-12 content and tends to be more of "just the math", which might work for a kid who actually likes math itself.)

The advantage to a strategy like this is that it is designed to fill gaps (which is often one of the objections to acceleration, compacting and/or skipping), and also has a much higher ceiling than is typically available to an elementary school teacher (or even, TBH, most high school math teachers). There are also crosswalk documents that align and correlate the topics in ALEKS to your state curriculum frameworks by grade and by secondary-school course, so the GT teacher should have no difficulty identifying where your DC is with respect to state requirements and expectations. It's designed firstly for institutional schools, so it has all the dashboards and teacher monitoring features that districts want, but it's also (FWIW) available to parents as a home subscription, if it turns out that you aren't able to get movement from the school, but want to give your DC a more structured option for self-paced learning. There's a free trial version that lasts a couple of weeks (I think), which would be a way to try it out, and maybe collect some data on present levels and rate of learning. I frequently recommend it to my homeschooling people if they are struggling with their existing math curriculum.

Free options that have some of the same self-paced options include Khan Academy and IXL. Khan Academy is more systematic, with brief instructional videos, but equally matter-of-fact, while IXL is more game-based, less comprehensive in content, and lacks embedded instruction.

Another option might be to discuss the possibility of cross-grading for math only, but that will likely depend on buy-in not only from administrators and GT staff, but also from both the sending and receiving teachers. It also depends on how well he would be able to meet the behavioral and executive function expectations of the receiving classroom, which tends to figure into the receptiveness of the district to this as a solution (even though, yes, it is related to his disability, and no, it has nothing to do with his math instructional needs). Plus, if the schedules can be made to align. If everything else works for this, the upside to this option is that all of the adults just do what they were going to do anyway. The only change for them is the physical location of your DC during math.

You'll notice that the theme across the solutions I've proposed so far is that they are minimally inconvenient to the adults involved. This is, of course, unfair to your DC, who (rightfully) is your priority, but it is also eminently practical. One of the contributors to successful advocacy is communicating not only your child's needs, and specific solutions (i.e., not just complaining, but offering answers), but also conveying your sympathetic awareness of the challenges and resource constraints that teachers and schools deal with. It is also both savvy and gracious to acknowledge and express appreciation for anything that they are doing well--or even simply intending well, no matter how small it might seem.

indigo has collated many thoughtful posts regarding advocacy; if you haven't yet had a chance to do so, I would strongly suggest searching back through the posts (try "advocacy as a non-newtonian fluid"--that's one of my personal favorite thread titles!) for much excellent advice and anecdotally-acquired wisdom.

You have admirably overcome many challenges. You are quite right that most people tend to judge by first appearances and your story isn’t one that would usually be revealed at first meeting. I hope you will have encounters that will give you joy, satisfaction and the feeling of being appreciated.

I’m not sure how relevant my comments would be since my son didn’t have any inherent learning difficulties to overcome, but considering our DSs have the shared experience of self-learning maths at a young age with YouTube videos, I thought I would offer a reply based on our experience.

Throughout primary school, DS has always had a much better understanding of maths than any of his teachers (their comments in his school reports have all included some form of such acknowledgement). Even at high school, by Yr 8, the Maths HoD, who was the only teacher capable of teaching the highest level of secondary school mathematics, made a comment to me that DS was superior to her entire faculty (including herself) in his knowledge and problem solving abilities.

Their great positive contribution to his extraordinary pace of learning was acknowledgement of the above and their active search for ways to enable him to self-learn. They never imposed grade level work on him - in the early grades, we modified his tasks such that he did the same math sheets, but he provided his answers in Roman numerals, binary, or other number bases and by Yr 4 (after he achieved a perfect score in the national numeracy assessment for Yr 3 students) they let him spend time on class computers researching whatever maths topics piqued his interest.

In this digital age, there are so many subscription based and free resources that kids can use to self learn. In his primary years, DS used his access to class computers to watch ‘Numberphile’ videos that posed a lot of thought provoking questions such as what rational vs irrational numbers would look like plotted on a Euclidean plane. Our local high school arranged subscription based access for all students to Maths Pathways which is a self paced maths program with built in teaching videos. When uptake was low due to the $60 annual fee, they switched to Maths Online with an annual fee of $12. Both of these programs are tailored to the Australian curriculum, but I suspect there’s a large overlap with US curricula, given each state has developed their own. Whilst we’ve only used Khan Academy for the occasional topic, I understand that it broadly covers the topics taught in US schools.

In summary, all of DS’s knowledge and skills were self-learnt and we owe a debt of gratitude to the teachers who recognised that providing access to materials was the best way to support him. This has stood in him in great stead for university, where his independent learning approach enables him to get the most out of lectures and tutorials.

Primary school teachers have around thirty students to cater for and high school maths teachers would typically teach a class of thirty at each grade, so they simply won’t have the capacity to accurately track students working beyond grade level. I’d encourage your DS to continue self learning and invite him to discuss with you what resources and support he needs to continue learning, so that your advocacy is specific and targeted, rather than expecting a teacher to individually track each student who is working beyond the grade level, when their main priority is to ensure the rest of the class achieves grade level competency.

I totally relate to this discussion about advocating for our gifted kids! I had a similar experience when my son was called a "speed star" in math class; it felt amazing, yet overwhelming. Finding the right balance between pushing him and letting him explore his interests has been tricky but so worth it!

Thank you for this insightful discussion on advocacy in the gifted community. The nuances you present about balancing individual needs with systemic changes resonate deeply. It's so crucial to foster environments that nurture diverse talents like those highlighted at Speed Stars, ensuring every gifted child has the opportunity to thrive.Thank you for this insightful discussion on advocacy in the gifted community. The nuances you present about balancing individual needs with systemic changes resonate deeply. It's so crucial to foster environments that nurture diverse talents like those highlighted at Speed Stars, ensuring every gifted child has the opportunity to thrive.