Thank you for the welcoming words, Jesse.
We know of hoagies, we agree; it is a great site. We are hoping for some insight into the asynchronous scores. We were perhaps vague and long winded. Some of our questions are:
1) Is there a test that accurately gauges math in non-writers?
2) Is there a test that doesn't count deeper processing as if it were the same as "slow" processing?
3) Is it possible that this FSIQ is accurate at all considering that the processing, coding, math portions were written and he gave up on them quickly?
4) Do all parents think their kid's FSIQ should more closely resemble the high scores?
