I just think that classifying children who show a majority of these characteristics as 'Visual-Spatial Learners' does a grave disservice to children who are emphatically not visual-spatial but still share those characteristics. My son has VCI > PRI by more than 2 standard deviations, and has severe deficits in visual processing, but he fits many of the descriptors on this list. I guess that my criterion is "Does this classification give you information that changes what you would do for your child in a meaningful and helpful way?", and I think that this list lumps too many disparate issues together in ways that could be profoundly misleading to pass that test.
