Grinity, great job of describing how the various functions interact with each other. I was almost 100% NF, 51% I and 60% P.
When you mention how Ts differ from Fs, I can describe what it is like for me. Rather than coming up with one set of reasoning for a given issue, I come up with many different thoughts. Even the thoughts I come up with leave me with the feeling there may be a better way or possibly some negative aspect of the best of these thoughts. In other cases, I feel all thoughts have some validity with each being better in certain circumstances or better for different people. A lot of the reasoning behind the negative aspects was hidden in my younger years and only triggered a feeling. Now, I am often consciously aware of the negative reasoning. I am not entirely sure all NFPs are as consciously aware of all the individual pieces of reasoning as I am.
Being an I/ENFP makes it much more difficult to come to a decision, but I feel the reasoning is still good. It also affects my communication as I try to add in the words to describe the uncertainty in the reasoning, even when it is the same as a TJ or TP individual. There is also the issue of having to take a subset of these many thoughts and then having to further summarize them. For every commment I make on a forum for instance, I have 10 or more pages of thoughts on many different sides of the same issue. I would also describe each of these many internal thoughts as being more STJ internally and then are combined to be NFP externally. I think this is why us Fs often come across as being somewhat in agreement with almost anything someone says, we have a similar thought, but feel there is more to it.
My interest in this topic is such, I could talk about it a lot, but I also don't want to hijack the thread. That's the F in me talking.
