We will agree to disagree. And yes if you read Fukyama's work of History being over as verbatim instead of considering it in the realms of how history has been recorded in the importance of the human factor who dictates it than maybe you can make the blanket statement. But I love the deeper picture and understand that all information we read as history has to be considered with many angles. I think I can relate with his message in the idea of how can we record history when the historian has his/her own upbringings that interfer with the purity of the information. We can't and because of his philosphical approach than I can further read between the lines. Basically, he opened my eyes.
