Originally Posted by madeinuk
I especially liked the axiomatic observation regarding the speed of meetings but it does have a positive side:

A meeting moves at the speed of the slowest mind in the room

YES to meetings going at the speed of the slowest person in the room. Not just meetings but entire projects. And not just projects but the entire organizational change process. I feel like I'm swimming in molasses most days, or revving my engine in neutral. I suppose that's why I hate group work so much. It's not that I don't like working with people, it's just that I always seem to end up stifled and underutilized, never "working at the top of my license," as they say, because I'm constantly holding myself back.

In my office, I also frequently get tapped to consult with or mentor colleagues, including my direct supervisors, and yet there's no quid pro quo. I'm always left wondering, when do I get to develop MY skills? Who is going to mentor me?

It's like I'm still in the second grade, where, after my mom declined a grade skip for all the wrong reasons, my teacher paired me up with the slowest person in the room, so I could help her with her work after I had finished mine. That was literally decades ago, and yet I find myself reliving the same scenario on a daily basis to this day!

I think the parallels between being a gifted child in a "no child left behind" classroom and a gifted adult in a lowest-common-denominator office setting are sorely unappreciated. I also believe that how a child experiences and deals with these issues in a classroom setting is highly predictive of how they're going to function in the work world (not especially well in my case).