Thanks, everyone. I have been reading (and re-reading the responses).
The OT administered a movement test battery for children -2, but said that he is functional, even though he appears not to have done well. She actually states this "demonstrates sensory seeking behaviors that may inhibit his ability to access the curriculum". It goes onto state that he does not need OT.
This has me puzzled. Shouldn't the school be providing services, especially when the OT says something like this in the report ?
Regardless of who is testing him, he displays very poor handwriting, that is simply not getting better with more & more practice. He writes fat letters/numbers -- again, everyone references this, but says that services are not needed. I will question why, but I was wondering if this is normal (for them to see a problem, but decide it is not severe enough ?)
