Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 102 guests, and 12 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    the social space, davidwilly, Jessica Lauren, Olive Dcoz, Anant
    11,557 Registered Users
    December
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7
    8 9 10 11 12 13 14
    15 16 17 18 19 20 21
    22 23 24 25 26 27 28
    29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
    Joined: May 2007
    Posts: 1,783
    Cathy A Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    Joined: May 2007
    Posts: 1,783
    http://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200910/backpage.cfm

    I'd like to hear your reactions to this article.

    Joined: Oct 2008
    Posts: 1,167
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Oct 2008
    Posts: 1,167
    I've run into this exact same thing with my DS14. It's memorization without any clear intent for understanding.


    Shari
    Mom to DS 10, DS 11, DS 13
    Ability doesn't make us, Choices do!
    Joined: Jun 2008
    Posts: 1,840
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Jun 2008
    Posts: 1,840
    I tutored math in college. I agree with this author.

    Most people will struggle with Calculus even if they are very bright. It takes a certain level of maturity to handle it and a good ability to solve problems methodically. It also takes a thorough grounding in Algebra and Trig. I always started with teaching how to solve problems using a method, then went into the nuts and bolts. I've seen D students make A's and I've seen a lot of others continue to fail.

    The answer to the issue is threefold.

    1. A lot of people do not belong in a technical field of study at the collegiate level. They need other technical outlets that are not primarily intellectual.
    2. Many teachers are not up to the task. Most retired engineers can teach math with their eyes closed, but no amount of instruction will make most teachers' college grads able to teach it.
    3. Kids should be grouped by ability based upon standardized tests. This way material can be presented in a way that is appropriate.

    The fact of 1-3 means the good teachers ability to impact the right students is diluted by pushing too many kids on the wrong study track. And then most students do not get the right exposure at the right time.






    Joined: Aug 2008
    Posts: 574
    D
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    D
    Joined: Aug 2008
    Posts: 574
    Ouch. That article sparked painful memories of my first attempt at college-level calculus. I was woefully unprepared & dropped the class rather quickly.

    I guess that nonsense in my senior year of sitting in the back of a classroom with a pre-calculus book to figure things out on my own with a small group of similarly ignored students didn't help me one whit.

    The author's comment about maturity resonated as well. I took another crack at college a handful of years later and absolutely smoked calculus (relatively speaking). I'd had no formal math since my first attempt, so could credit nothing other than being a little bit older.

    The author's three main complaints are discussed beautifully:
    1. Confusing difficulty with rigor.
    2. Mistaking process for understanding.
    3. Teaching concepts that are developmentally inappropriate.

    Looking back, I think our teachers in HS stumbled the most @ #2. There was a whole lot of memorization, but understanding? Not so much. I'm one who thrives on knowing all the why's & wherefore's -- once I get those under my belt I can run in any direction.

    Determining what exactly constitutes "developmentally appropriate" for DS is going to be a challenge -- I can see that already.

    Thanks for sharing this article!


    Being offended is a natural consequence of leaving the house. - Fran Lebowitz
    Joined: May 2007
    Posts: 1,783
    Cathy A Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    Joined: May 2007
    Posts: 1,783
    I think this is an interesting article and it makes a lot of good points, but it skims over a very real problem: most adults are not developmentally ready for calculus. A currriculum path that prepares students for a science major will not work for most students. As long as we try to find a one-size-fits-all approach, we are going to fail. This article advocates a developmentally appropriate curriculum. Developmentally appropriate for whom? If we design a curriculum that is appropriate for most students it will fail to adequately prepare those with math talent.

    It is true that some people confuse rigor with difficulty, but the real problem illustrated by the author's anecdotes is that the teachers were not capable of understanding the material themselves! How does he expect bright students to be prepared for calculus if they can't do rate problems in eighth grade? Or understand what an identity is? These concepts are developmentally appropriate for eighth graders on the track for scientific careers.

    Yes, the focus on testing is counterproductive. But it exists because we perceive that there is a real deficiency in the ability of teachers to actually teach math! To fix this problem, we need to pay math teachers enough to buy competence for our public schools. And we need to provide developmentally appropriate curricula for different ability groups.

    Of course you can't instruct students by assigning material that they aren't prepared for. I don't think that necessarily means that the material is inappropriate, but that the lack of preparation is systemic. Ganem doesn't address that. He seems to excuse teachers from knowing the material by saying that he himself found it difficult.

    Articles like this are used as support for those who want to dumb down the curriculum. I don't think that's the right approach. I think we need to stop expecting to prepare everyone for calculus. I don't think that's a realistic expectation.

    Last edited by Cathy A; 10/19/09 04:52 PM.
    Joined: Apr 2006
    Posts: 778
    D
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    D
    Joined: Apr 2006
    Posts: 778
    My impression of this editorial was similar to Cathy�s crystallized response.

    Imagine the �take away� many educators would find and later mention to parents seeking math acceleration for their gifted child. Dr. Ganem should have included the �gifted caveat� as was later added by the author of �The Hurried Child� after his book had been cited as reason to retain countless kids with age peers.
    Quote
    3. Teaching concepts that are developmentally inappropriate. Teaching advanced algebra in middle school pushes concepts on students that are beyond normal development at that age. Walking is not taught to six-month olds and reading is not taught to two-year olds because children are not developmentally ready at those ages for those skills. When it comes to math, all teachers dream of arriving at a crystal clear explanation of a concept that will cause an immediate �aha� moment for the student. But those flashes of insight cannot happen until the student is developmentally ready. Because math involves knowledge and understanding of symbolic representations for abstract concepts it is extremely difficult to short cut development.

    I found myself bristled when reading his analogy about developmentally inappropriate skills since each of my kids walked (cruised) at six months and sight-read a fair amount at two years.

    Joined: Oct 2008
    Posts: 1,299
    I
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    I
    Joined: Oct 2008
    Posts: 1,299
    I was nodding my head in agreement at the beginning of the article as he described the problems of students not being prepared for college level math. By the end, I was bristling like delbows when I realized this would probably just be fodder to accuse parents of "pushing" children into developmentally inappropriate math.

    DD7 is on a different developmental path as Grinity described so well in another post and I copied below. To me it is developmentally inappropriate to focus on the speed of her math drills. Her basic addition and subtraction speed is fast enough so it's not a hindrance as she tackles 2 digit multiplication and long division. Isn't that the whole point of math drills and not just speed for speed's sake? Grrr!

    Originally Posted by Grinity
    Most children are on the normal developmental path, where their handwriting develops at about the same pace as their reading, and their ability to understand Math ideas comes AFTER they are wonderful at speed Math Facts. But the problem with norms, is that although they apply to most kids, they do not apply to all kids. My son is on a different developmental path, one which is quite common to gifted kids, and his learning needs need to be evaluated chunk by chunk instead of relying on norms. He is ready for bigger ideas, in Math and in Reading, right now, even though his fingers are still at age-level.

    Joined: Apr 2006
    Posts: 778
    D
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    D
    Joined: Apr 2006
    Posts: 778
    Originally Posted by master of none
    Here's my question: Does anybody know what is developmentally appropriate at each age? If math is developmental, is there a chart to describe the development somewhere? Is it really true that most adults are not developmentally ready for calculus?
    I have some further questions for the science/engineering experts here.

    What is the appropriate level to introduce calculators for use in classroom math and should their use be allowed without restriction from that point forward?

    I ask because my kids attend different schools with different approaches (neither could use one in their elementary/middle school math courses). My daughter was required to have a graphing calculator beginning with her freshman advanced algebra (1 and � of 2) class. My son still hasn�t been allowed a calculator in math class (high school honors geometry), including for the ITBS and other standardized tests.

    Which approach is better and why? Thanks.

    Joined: Mar 2008
    Posts: 302
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Mar 2008
    Posts: 302
    Well now you've got me trying to figure out what the three or four things are! LOL... If you count "factoring" as one thing (although it covers several chapters when you go into the detail of linear vs. quadratic and simple quadratic vs. completing the square and/or the quadratic equation), that's a start... then maybe "isolating a variable" could include all the rules of manipulating equations and situations where one equation will do vs. when you need two or three...

    Hey, that covers most of it right there! Maybe there are only two things you need... wink


    Erica
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 6,145
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 6,145
    Originally Posted by Dottie
    I have a 7th grade student at my private school. She's absolutely bright. And she possibly could have been ready for algebra on intellect and "readiness" alone. But I'm finding her extremely ill-prepared in the basics, frown . She's a good example of why you need both...concepts and computational skills. She can pick up concepts fairly quickly, but the whole package just isn't there. (And I will NOT be the one telling her mother that she's not ready for algebra!!!)


    I just this morning started algebra with DS8. I have been dragging my feet on it, reviewing the basics because I feared he wasn't ready. But he has been acting out, and I realized that his behavior looked a lot like it looked in 1st grade when he was underchallenged. I made the switch and his behavior this morning was the polar opposite of how he has been most of the school year this year.

    That's a long way of saying that I am reading this thread with interest because I'm personally trying to find that balance right now! Tips are welcome!


    Kriston
    Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    No gifted program in school
    by Anant - 12/19/24 05:58 PM
    Gifted Conference Index
    by ickexultant - 12/04/24 06:05 PM
    Gift ideas 12-year-old who loves math, creating
    by Eagle Mum - 11/29/24 06:18 PM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5