This is my concern for undocumented immigrants.
An example: according to the CA Dep't of Health, (
see article in LA Times), whoooping cough/pertussis isn't a problem in Mexico, our largest source of undocumented immigrants (they do a good job of vaccinating there). So this one, at least, is a white-folks disease. This makes perfect sense, because upper-middle class college-educated US Caucasians are a major demographic questioning vaccination.
My information was easy to find and was from a reliable source. I'd be interested in knowing your source of information about undocumented residents.
Your point gets back to the demographic outlined above and other points about education: some people
think they're finding reliable information, but they
aren't, and they allow themselves to be fooled. I'm not claiming that every information source I've ever used is perfect, but I will say that my information about vaccination comes from reputable sources.
We also have things like DTaP as an alternative to DTP (a vaccine which resulted in some claims).
No, we don't. DTP isn't an alternative to DTaP; it's an old vaccine for the same diseases (licensed 1949). It hasn't been used in the United States since 1991. The risk of neurological problems due to the old vaccine was 1:140,000 --- staggeringly low compared to what happens if you get tetanus (50,000 or more
annual deaths worldwide before the vaccine was widespread) or diptheria (13,000-15,000 annual US deaths in the 1920s out of 100K-200K annual cases or
7.5-15% of cases ended in death. Most cases were children. The first vaccine was licensed in 1924).
Indigo, you're doing a great job of demonstrating how people argue/make decisions based on misinformation. This is bordering on being enough for a case study.
