Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 24 guests, and 206 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    FionaFox, assistantb, throwelder, manedwolf, Tiny0121
    11,900 Registered Users
    February
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7
    8 9 10 11 12 13 14
    15 16 17 18 19 20 21
    22 23 24 25 26 27 28
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 1 of 2 1 2
    #160778 06/22/13 03:52 AM
    Joined: Feb 2010
    Posts: 2,641
    Likes: 3
    B
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    B
    Joined: Feb 2010
    Posts: 2,641
    Likes: 3
    I'd like to start a thread discussing the educational paths of intellectually accomplished people, especially those who were accelerated. Ken Wilson, who died recently, won a Nobel prize in physics for his work on phase transitions and the renormalization group. He was accelerated two grades in K-12 and entered Harvard at 16. The book he mentions reading in junior high school to "learn the basic principle of calculus", "Mathematics and the Imagination" by Kasner and Newman, is available as an inexpensive Dover reprint and has received good reviews on Amazon.

    http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1982/wilson-bio.html

    Quote
    I was born 1936 in Waltham, Massachusetts, the son of E. Bright Wilson Jr. and Emily Buckingham Wilson. My father was on the faculty in the Chemistry Department of Harvard University; my mother had one year of graduate work in physics before her marriage. My grandfather on my mother's side was a professor of mechanical engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology; my other grandfather was a lawyer, and one time Speaker of the Tennessee House of Representatives.

    My schooling took place in Wellesley, Woods Hole, Massachusetts (second, third/fourth grades in two years), Shady Hill School in Cambridge, Mass. (from fifth to eighth grade), ninth grade at the Magdalen College School in Oxford, England, and tenth and twelfth grades (skipping the eleventh) at the George School in eastern Pennsylvania. Before the year in England I had read about mathematics and physics in books supplied by my father and his friends. I learned the basic principle of calculus from Mathematics and Imagination by Kasner and Newman, and went of to work through a calculus text, until I got stuck in a chapter on involutes and evolutes. Around this time I decided to become a physicist. Later (before entering college) I remember working on symbolic logic with my father; he also tried, unsuccessfully, to teach me group theory. I found high school dull. In 1952 I entered Harvard. I majored in mathematics, but studied physics (both by intent), participated in the Putnam Mathematics competition, and ran the mile for the track team (and crosscountry as well). I began research, working summers at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, especially for Arnold Arons (then based at Amherst).

    An obituary is at http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/21/science/kenneth-wilson-nobel-physicist-dies-at-77.html



    S
    squishys
    Unregistered
    squishys
    Unregistered
    S
    Great idea! I'm looking forward to reading about accelerated success stories.

    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 5,181
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 5,181
    Let me just say that as a chemist, this is SO not what I thought that thread title meant. grin

    I like this way better, incidentally.


    Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 649
    K
    Kai Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    K
    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 649
    Originally Posted by HowlerKarma
    Let me just say that as a chemist, this is SO not what I thought that thread title meant. grin

    Same here!

    Joined: Feb 2013
    Posts: 1,228
    2
    22B Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    2
    Joined: Feb 2013
    Posts: 1,228
    One pretty obvious example is Murray Gell-Mann
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray_Gell-Mann
    who was the PhD advisor of Kenneth G. Wilson
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_G._Wilson

    Originally Posted by Bostonian
    ... The book he mentions reading in junior high school to "learn the basic principle of calculus", "Mathematics and the Imagination" by Kasner and Newman, is available as an inexpensive Dover reprint and has received good reviews on Amazon.

    http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1982/wilson-bio.html

    Originally Posted by Wilson Bio
    ... I learned the basic principle of calculus from Mathematics and Imagination by Kasner and Newman, and went of to work through a calculus text, until I got stuck in a chapter on involutes and evolutes. ...

    What are "involutes and evolutes"?

    A potential list of "famous accelerants" is here
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_child_prodigies

    22B #160786 06/22/13 11:07 AM
    Joined: Feb 2010
    Posts: 2,641
    Likes: 3
    B
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    B
    Joined: Feb 2010
    Posts: 2,641
    Likes: 3
    Originally Posted by 22B
    Originally Posted by Wilson Bio
    ... I learned the basic principle of calculus from Mathematics and Imagination by Kasner and Newman, and went of to work through a calculus text, until I got stuck in a chapter on involutes and evolutes. ..

    What are "involutes and evolutes"?

    A potential list of "famous accelerants" is here
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_child_prodigies

    There is a wikipedia article on "involute" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Involute (which also defines "evolute").

    Googling "gifted accelerants" shows that my use of the term "accelerant" is not unique smile.


    Joined: Apr 2011
    Posts: 1,694
    M
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Apr 2011
    Posts: 1,694

    Joined: Jan 2008
    Posts: 1,691
    Likes: 1
    W
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    W
    Joined: Jan 2008
    Posts: 1,691
    Likes: 1
    Tangent warning. I linked in to Feynman, thinking he would be an "accelerant" but his IQ was estimated to be 125. It appears that he was like Einstein, PG on the math and physics portion but low on the verbal. Didn't get into Columbia but accepted into MIT. Now you can easily get into Columbia when MIT wouldn't put you on the considered list.

    Sorry, I went off topic, but I found this interesting.

    Wren #160799 06/23/13 05:50 AM
    Joined: Feb 2013
    Posts: 40
    I
    Junior Member
    Offline
    Junior Member
    I
    Joined: Feb 2013
    Posts: 40
    Originally Posted by Wren
    Tangent warning. I linked in to Feynman, thinking he would be an "accelerant" but his IQ was estimated to be 125. It appears that he was like Einstein, PG on the math and physics portion but low on the verbal. Didn't get into Columbia but accepted into MIT. Now you can easily get into Columbia when MIT wouldn't put you on the considered list.

    Sorry, I went off topic, but I found this interesting.

    Interesting example.
    Low on the verbal? But Feynman was a great teacher and loved to teach.

    Last edited by iynait; 06/23/13 05:51 AM.
    Wren #160803 06/23/13 06:12 AM
    Joined: Mar 2012
    Posts: 100
    R
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    R
    Joined: Mar 2012
    Posts: 100
    Originally Posted by Wren
    Tangent warning. I linked in to Feynman, thinking he would be an "accelerant" but his IQ was estimated to be 125. It appears that he was like Einstein, PG on the math and physics portion but low on the verbal. Didn't get into Columbia but accepted into MIT. Now you can easily get into Columbia when MIT wouldn't put you on the considered list.

    The Ivies had hard limits on the numbers of Jewish kids they would accept in that era. It was very explicit. Feynman even mentions this in one of his memoirs. That has more to do with why he didn't get in to Columbia than ability.

    -chris

    Page 1 of 2 1 2

    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    PhD in physics, average IQ?
    by aeh - 02/25/26 02:45 PM
    Online calculus
    by FrameistElite - 02/23/26 01:25 AM
    Should We Advocate Further?
    by Alaricc - 02/12/26 01:12 AM
    How to get child to actually "study"
    by Faylie - 02/11/26 11:32 PM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5