Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 437 guests, and 25 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    ddregpharmask, Emerson Wong, Markas, HarryKevin91, Harry Kevin
    11,431 Registered Users
    May
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 2 of 2 1 2
    Joined: Apr 2013
    Posts: 2
    H
    Junior Member
    OP Offline
    Junior Member
    H
    Joined: Apr 2013
    Posts: 2
    Thank you all so much for your replies. I spoke briefly with the tester on the phone after I submitted this and she said that she she didn't know what happened with the comprehension. She has known him for a couple of years and couldn't quite understand why he wasn't getting the comprehension answers right. We were surprised too. He always seems to be able to comprehend books etc. She is a doctor of physchology and has done thousands of these tests and was unconcerned with the processing speed subsets because she said that this can sometimes in children with high intellectual potential.

    Re mood/behaviour: His test behaviour was consistent and he sustained focus and exerted substantial effort on what was achieveable. He was quick to surrender on items that were not immediately apparent to him. Perhaps suggesting he is a perfectionist (all or nothing approach to academic challenges).

    My son is 7 and in year 2. We have never had any concerns with Autism but were more concerned with ADHD as a small child because his mind and body were constantly on the move. As he has matured, this all seems to have settled. This is how we originally met the tester.

    He has been at the same school for three years. He is young for his year, but has always academically been fine (picks things up quickly, never struggling, but just average to above average) and has a big personality. While academics have been fine, the teacher called me earlier this year to say that she felt he was bright and wasn't achieving his potential and that he was too laid back in class. She put him next to the brightest boy in the class and they are doing the same work. They have had testing done on four of the children in the year and have now pulled them out to attend extended maths classes. She wanted testing to back her up in being able to send our son. I don't know whether these are good enough to send him.

    We didn't have any achievement testing done.

    Re box: I was/am concerned that they will look at this and every report going forward will be poor for comprehension and good for the things that came up strongly (not that I fully understand what that is yet). Rather than using this to tap in and unleash potential and identify and areas to help him with. I am concerned that each new teacher will look at this report and have a preconceived view of his potential and lack of in some areas.

    Joined: Apr 2011
    Posts: 1,694
    M
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Apr 2011
    Posts: 1,694
    Happykids the Comprehension subtest is not reading comprehension - the questions are more about social/moral reasoning. Which is why suppressed Comprehension with other verbal areas strong can be indicative of a spectrum disorder. There was someone on this board who recently posted about her child answering these questions wildly incorrectly due to a misconception about what the tester wanted from her. You'd really want to have other signs or concerns before getting hung up on whether one suppressed subtest in the WISC results indicate anything too worrisome.

    The PRI is, roughly speaking, thought to align more with mathematical thinking and we was very strong there. Strong working memory is going to help there too.

    Page 2 of 2 1 2

    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    2e & long MAP testing
    by aeh - 05/16/24 04:30 PM
    psat questions and some griping :)
    by aeh - 05/16/24 04:21 PM
    Employers less likely to hire from IVYs
    by mithawk - 05/13/24 06:50 PM
    For those interested in science...
    by indigo - 05/11/24 05:00 PM
    Beyond IQ: The consequences of ignoring talent
    by Eagle Mum - 05/03/24 07:21 PM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5