Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    1 members (lossstarry), 831 guests, and 17 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    Twinsy12, wwfsmd, henrygreen, steve john, djangoframe
    11,605 Registered Users
    March
    S M T W T F S
    1
    2 3 4 5 6 7 8
    9 10 11 12 13 14 15
    16 17 18 19 20 21 22
    23 24 25 26 27 28 29
    30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
    Joined: Mar 2010
    Posts: 615
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Mar 2010
    Posts: 615
    Dude, I'm not sure what your point is. I never disputed that *some* places are awful.

    I'm talking about places that my child or the children of close friends have gone to, so I know in some detail how they are run.

    Unless your wife has a degree in Early Childhood Education, she would not be eligible for employment at the places I'm talking about.


    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 2,856
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 2,856
    Originally Posted by ColinsMum
    That's very sad, and it isn't what happens in good babyrooms. But more generally, these perception differences are very odd. I wonder whether it's largely driven by the fact(?) that available daycares suit the needs of some children but not others - and maybe also that whatever these factors are are largely inherited so parents of children it doesn't suit think these places are awful, and parents of children it does suit think they're great?

    Well, I can say with confidence that in the cases DW experienced, the perception difference was largely driven by the fact that she was an insider who had access to privileged information, so to speak. After all, this place in the example did not advertise itself with the slogan, "We'll keep your baby alive."

    The information shared with the parents on a daily basis was often times an outright lie.

    Joined: Nov 2012
    Posts: 2,513
    Likes: 1
    A
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    A
    Joined: Nov 2012
    Posts: 2,513
    Likes: 1
    Originally Posted by MegMeg
    Dude, I'm not sure what your point is. I never disputed that *some* places are awful.

    Disclaimer: Dude, please feel free to correct me if I'm misinterpreting you.

    MegMeg, I think Dude is highlighting the problem of asymmetric information in making a preschool selection. In a heterogeneous market, all facilities have an incentive to market themselves under a friendly banner. Without search costs becoming prohibitively high in many locations, parents can't reasonably know what kind of preschool they are visiting, even if everyone is accredited, etc. There is simply too much individual variation.

    It's a classic Ackerlof's Lemons problem.


    What is to give light must endure burning.
    Joined: Nov 2012
    Posts: 2,513
    Likes: 1
    A
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    A
    Joined: Nov 2012
    Posts: 2,513
    Likes: 1
    Cross-post!


    What is to give light must endure burning.
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 2,856
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 2,856
    Originally Posted by aquinas
    Originally Posted by MegMeg
    Dude, I'm not sure what your point is. I never disputed that *some* places are awful.

    Disclaimer: Dude, please feel free to correct me if I'm misinterpreting you.

    MegMeg, I think Dude is highlighting the problem of asymmetric information in making a preschool selection. In a heterogeneous market, all facilities have an incentive to market themselves under a friendly banner. Without search costs becoming prohibitively high in many locations, parents can't reasonably know what kind of preschool they are visiting, even if everyone is accredited, etc. There is simply too much individual variation.

    It's a classic Ackerlof's Lemons problem.

    I think you said it better than I would have, though there are other factors.

    First, this is a business, and the business is going to put itself forward in the best light possible, and may often make claims that are categorically untrue. So yeah, basically what you said.

    Second, parents aren't privy to everything that goes on. They have to rely on secondary sources. Those sources are both unreliable... their children (maturity/perception issues) and the staff (biased).

    And third, parents have an inherent psychological bias. If both parents have to work, and there's no other choice, then the parents really don't want to believe that they're placing their child in a bad situation. So if they're hearing and seeing one thing from their children, and another thing from the staff, selection bias skews the parent to want to believe the sunnier corporate message. There's a role here for cognitive dissonance as well.

    So, many parents will report, "My child is in a really good daycare" regardless of the actual quality of the daycare, and even when they know there are problems.

    I'm not saying that's MegMeg's experience, but the claim that great quality daycare is available from a number of providers in a small town is highly questionable. Norway seems to have some good ideas on daycare, but in the US, profits take precedence.

    Joined: Jul 2010
    Posts: 480
    T
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    T
    Joined: Jul 2010
    Posts: 480
    Originally Posted by Mana
    MegMeg,

    The message I got from the article was that it may not be detrimental for my DD to be homeschooled/unschooled for the next couple of years despite what most people around me believe. My friends are absolutely convinced that I'm doing DD a great disservice by not sending her to a feeder preschool. They think I'm taking attachment parenting to the extreme and if I don't put her into the right preschool next year, she won't ever get into the right college in 15 years.

    I do think DD would enjoy a bit of structured socialization a few hours a week so I'm still looking for a quality secular play-based part-time preschool that accepts parent volunteers but I have yet to find anything that even comes close. frown

    Where I live that model is called co-op preschool.


    Joined: Apr 2011
    Posts: 1,694
    M
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Apr 2011
    Posts: 1,694
    I don't know that it's THAT hard to get a sense of how a daycare or preschool operates? We chose a daycare for DD#3 last year and as we stood chatting with the director, after getting the fairly irrelevant tour, I had plenty of time to watch the other staff with the kids and see that staff at place #1 had bunches of kids sitting on knees or nearby, but that they weren't actually interacting with those kids, and instead were absent-mindedly distracting the children while they had nice chats with each other, the whole time that we were there. The other kids were milling around aimlessly. Place #2 on the other hand had visibly better staff to child ratios, the kids were all busily doing stuff (sand pit, pushing things, swinging, painting, puzzles, all manner o things), the staff were readily directing aimless kids to new things to try and they were getting down onto 2yr old eye level to talk to seemingly non-verbal kids like they would understand every word said to them. No staff having chats with each other because they were too busy talking to kids and getting stuff done... No guesses which place we chose. And every time I walk in I see the same thing - busy children doing a variety of activities and busy staff that see everything that goes on, walk away from adult conversation (with parents) to fix problems they see and who talk to the children like people who deserve respect. Would my DD rather spend a day 1:1 with a devote adult, of course; Yet I certainly don't think daycare is harming her and I do think it's actively beneficial to spend some time with kids roughly her own age (which there is little chance of outside of daycare, our eldest is older than our friends' kids and our youngest is younger).

    Joined: Nov 2012
    Posts: 2,513
    Likes: 1
    A
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    A
    Joined: Nov 2012
    Posts: 2,513
    Likes: 1
    Wonderful to hear you and your husband are reaching mutual understanding. Best of luck as you embark on homeschooling. smile


    What is to give light must endure burning.
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 5,181
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 5,181
    We did Montessori/Charlotte-Mason/eclectic homeschool with our DD, as well.

    My MIL was similarly horrified that we weren't sending DD(13) to preschool... it just "isn't done" apparently, in her world. Her tone indicated that we should probably begin preparing ourselves for DD's eventual miserable life on the streets... ::sigh::

    Unfortunately, we kept mysteriously getting left stagnating on waiting lists, or even more mysteriously, getting placed ON waiting lists even when other people weren't told about wait lists.... (yeah, well... disability is a beast that way, let's just say).

    So homeschooling was more default than well-reasoned choice for us, but I have to say that I don't think that I'd do it differently even knowing what I know now from ten years out.

    It was the right thing to do given the other options. Glad that your DH is listening and that you're working together as a team! laugh


    Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
    Joined: Nov 2012
    Posts: 2,513
    Likes: 1
    A
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    A
    Joined: Nov 2012
    Posts: 2,513
    Likes: 1
    Originally Posted by Mana
    Thank you. smile

    It's rather amusing how he's now re-written the history and the way he remembers it, he was always supportive of doing Montessori at home, etc. At least knowing him, I know that he didn't give in just to get me off his case because he does not operate that way especially when DD's interests are involved.

    I know your little one is still young but before you know it, it'd be time for preschool. Time flies when you have an exhausting/all-consuming child. smile

    Ha! It was originally his idea, right? wink

    Time really does disappear! My husband and I have already planned for me to be home with my son during his "preschool" time, which will run to age 3.

    Then, we'll have to cross the kindergarten bridge when we have more information about DS' personality, needs, etc. Public schools here offer up to full day kindergarten for 4 year olds, which I think is too heavy an instiutional load for such young children. I'm also skeptical about the educational quality of our local schools when my 16 month old has already hit many of their curricular goals without instruction. We shall see...in the fullness of time!


    What is to give light must endure burning.
    Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Help with knowing what to do next [UPDATED]
    by FrameistElite - 03/12/25 08:31 AM
    US Colleges Ranked by IQ
    by thx1138 - 03/11/25 10:20 AM
    How to get closure as 2e gifted?
    by indigo - 02/26/25 05:27 PM
    Help Understanding Scores - WISC-V, NNAT3 w/ADHD
    by millersb02 - 02/22/25 06:17 AM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5