Originally Posted by Dottie
Hmm, tough question. From my experience, I would say that he's definitely "better" because of his brains, attention, understanding of the game, etc. I of course can't say if he's also better because of rote skill. Both really are important where sports are involved. My son has played Little League baseball from the start (age 5). He is an above average, but not stellar player. He has the illusion though of being pretty good because he knows the plays, gets the concepts, etc. He pays incredible attention on the field, and covers for others when they miss their plays. He typically plays in the annual all star game (top 2-3 players per team of 14). However, in our case...the athletic "skill" is not necessarily there. I don't mean to sell him short. He does extremely well in Little League, but he's not the "play up" kid, and his throws and hits are weaker than those I consider to be the truly talented players.

My son is 11, and this opinion of him has developed over time. At 7, it's really hard to say just yet. He does sound like he has excellent potential though! Enjoy the thrill of it all, smile .

I should just erase my post and quote you. haha. That's exactly how I feel about DS6, though obviously younger than your DS.