Sorry to get on a soapbox on your thread, questions. But I just really feel that differentiaion--while a lifesaver in the case of certain kids with conscientious teachers--is a lousy, lousy choice for GT policy. Anytime I see it written into policy, I get cranky!
I want more!!!
I totally agree. As a policy, it's a lousy idea. And to be fair to the teachers, it probably makes their lives difficult too. Ability grouping would be s-o-o-o much easier on everyone.
I taught a hands-on science class at a local college last winter. My students were as heterogenous as any group you'd find in a public school class. I worked very hard at finding new tasks for the ones who were ahead and struggled to meet the needs of the slower learners. That course was three hours of pure exhaustion twice a week, but I felt that I had a responsibility to the students.
Keep ranting Kriston!!
Val
