Mumof3, so it sounds like what you're saying is that seeing the dyslexia through the testing process after effective remediation is a matter of experience and qualitative observations. I was wondering if that would be the case. When I took DS for a followup speech evaluation, the tester said she could see he had "therapized" speech.
It's not just that it's a matter of qualative observations, but that someone testing a child with a 120+ IQ who is reading 18+ months ahead and spelling at age level is not going to decide they should run extra tests to go looking for a problem... Why would they? The final psychologist would not have even considered dyslexia looking at my child...
