Does dead average mean her FSIQ is right at 100 or it's up around the higher end of "average" on the bell curve? Were her subtest scores consistently "average" or did they vary wildly? If your dd is struggling with reading issues, and if the subtest scores show variation, it's a good idea to look at them in detail to determine if visual processing or other challenges might have impacted some of the subtest scores.
Yep, dead average 100. Psych wouldn't even look at or consider the scatter. She was really no help. First wisc was administered by a student studying for a bachelors and just noted significant scatter and the rarity of it.
That doesn't mean your 6 year old dd's testing isn't accurate - it just means it's *possible* it's inflated.
Just curious as to how a score could be inflated. Not offended at all, just wondering as I have little knowledge of how testing works.
