If you have the scaled scores (the #s that are btwn 1-19), you should also take a look at figuring a General Ability Index (GAI) rather than Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) b/c the variation btwn the indeces would indicate that the FSIQ isn't the best measure of his intellect. The report for figuring the GAI can be found here:
http://www.ksde.org/Portals/0/Special%20Education%20Services/gifted/WISCIVTechReport4.pdfHe looks like someone who would be a strong student, and one who might do well with some advanced classes. The verbal comprehension index (VCI) usually correlates pretty well with scholastic achievement and that's his high one. The other thing to look for, if you have those scaled scores again, is whether there was a lot of scatter within the indeces themselves. For instance, his 92nd percentile VCI looks like a bright-mildly gifted child in the verbal realm. However, if the scores within the VCI were all over the place (some very low and some very high) rather than all clustering within a few points of one another, he might be more able than that.
FWIW, my one child with ADHD, inattentive type, had a similar profile but much more uneven (higher highs and lower lows). Low processing speed and working memory in comparison to the other two indeces can sometimes be common among kids with ADD and other learning disabilities. On the other hand, an IQ test alone should never be used to diagnose a LD. I have another child with much lower processing speed who does not have a LD as well.
