Right, well Psychologists can't just substitute sub tests because they feel like it, but depending on whether similarities was lower due to an actual weakness, distracted moment or whatever, that information score was not counted and you would have seen a higher VCI and GAI if it had been able to be used. Add that to block design and some others that may be being suppressed by spd and this may explain to some extent why you dont feel these numbers quite match the kid you see.
I assume the tester did that extra test because they kind of thought so too, though maybe your tester always does information. Have you asked them?
