Hm... no, no words of wisdom. They probably only did the WISC VC and PR because either (1) they think the GAI is a better measure of what they're looking for (2) they knew that dysgraphia would trash PS and that low WM is quite common in the dyslexic population (since from your descriptions, it sounds like he has needs in both areas). The dysgraphia frankly probably wouldn't even have affected Block Design unless it were severe (and they could check with BDN (no time bonus) to get a better read on that). Picture Concepts and Matrix Reasoning are not likely to be hit by dysgraphia or dyslexia (they are completely visual and oral, and the visuals are designed to be easy to see, even for kids with imperfect visual processing), might get hit with a low working memory but a gifted kid with strong fluid reasoning, even with LDs, would generally do better on those two subtests.
Yes, if those are 94th percentiles (I was hoping they were T scores or NCEs), they aren't all that much different from the rest of the scores -- z+1 (one standard deviation above the mean), not the z+2 they are asking for.
The tricky thing is that it may be that he's a 2E kid, or it may be that he's a smart-but-not-gifted-and-also-LD kid. We have to be fair to all of the possible hypotheses. This testing is not sufficient to really elucidate the problems in processing and academics and such such that it's clear which hypothesis has more support. School-based evaluations generally can't do this, and even most evaluators have no training on the topic -- that's why people come to seriously-geeky people like the Eides or myself for evaluations.
