In our report the tester pointed out the difference in processing speed and the other scores and included his reasoning (because at 7 the score is not uncommon) and also that her working memory was very good (which rules out some other issues that they look for). He included her level of interest throughout the test, what really excited her, and when her attention began to flag. And he made a point of explaining her scores by comparing her level to the age of an average child at that level.
He also told us verbally that she did hit the ceiling and that he could do the extended norms (for a fee). We didn't see the need (particularly since we paid for the testing ourselves) at that time.
I point all this out because I've seen posts here where it seems that parents aren't getting that much data from their testers or have the ability to discuss their questions. Obviously we had a great experience, and I hope that level of engagement and information isn't unusual.
