A few things draw my attention:
His PSI is markedly lower than any of the other index scores, and suggests that the GAI is likely a better way of looking at his thinking and reasoning abilities than the FSIQ. He also has an unusually large split between the subtests that comprise the FRI, with quantitative/mathematical reasoning comparable to his VCI, but abstract-visual patterning much lower, in the middle of the Average range, which suggests that the measure of nonverbal fluid reasoning may also not fully capture his ability. (Matrix Reasoning is an outlier compared to all of his other reasoning subtests.)
If you don't feel the final report is sufficiently informative, and you feel comfortable posting his achievement numbers, that might also be a source of some additional insight. If in fact he is 2e, it would not be too surprising for a clinician without particular expertise in the area to perceive him as more evenly-developed (with neither giftedness nor disabilities), as combining tasks into composites often washes out the discrepancies that might be more apparent at a finer subtest level.
And I feel obliged to add that the remark you quoted from the evaluator is not representative of everyone in the profession...
