Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 275 guests, and 120 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    apetrakos, Virat18, michaelarrington, zsdlsd, elonmaskx
    11,701 Registered Users
    June
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7
    8 9 10 11 12 13 14
    15 16 17 18 19 20 21
    22 23 24 25 26 27 28
    29 30
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    #71142 03/12/10 06:46 AM
    Joined: Dec 2009
    Posts: 393
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    Joined: Dec 2009
    Posts: 393
    Any important differences I should take into account as we move forward with the AT that are similar to the differences between S-B V and WISC IV, or is the nature of achievement tests such that it doesn't really make a difference whether we use W-J or KTEA (are there any other regularly used ones?)

    Since now I am second guessing my decision to use WISC instead of SB for the IQ testing, I felt I'd better start obsessing about something new laugh

    Thanks, Cat

    Joined: Aug 2009
    Posts: 347
    M
    Mam Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Aug 2009
    Posts: 347
    WIAT is also very widely used. I know very little about AT, but I do know that WJ has timed components for every area (fluency). My dd is not particularly fast with her arithmetic, so I found it extremely useful to have an objective measure of that. (While fluency in math was her lowest score, it was still ahead of grade level. Little things like that were the useful bits we got from AT.

    Joined: Feb 2008
    Posts: 258
    K
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    K
    Joined: Feb 2008
    Posts: 258
    I'm a WJ fan. And I wouldn't stress the WISC/SB unless you have a mathcraziedboy which an S-B might illuminate a little better - but really...

    Joined: Dec 2009
    Posts: 393
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    Joined: Dec 2009
    Posts: 393
    Thanks for the insights - it doesn't seem to be too big of a difference.

    kcab, which book are you thinking about?

    And yes, he is a mathcraziedboy! And I am not really stressing, we had some minor concern re: LDs and felt the WISC would give richer information via the subtests. And I think we got that information, so it prob. was the right choice.

    Cat

    Joined: Dec 2009
    Posts: 393
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    Joined: Dec 2009
    Posts: 393
    Originally Posted by kcab
    I was thinking of Gilman's Academic Advocacy book and Assouline & Lupkowski-Shoplik's Developing Math Talent. The Developing Math Talent book indicates that WJ isn't detailed enough to plan math programming, but it at least *mentions* the WJ (WIAT not mentioned even). Academic Advocacy uses WJ in most examples, I think.

    If you know of any with WIAT examples, please let me know! I'm wishing I knew what to suggest/insist.

    Here's the links I mentioned before: WIAT (II? III?) to WJ III numerical ops and
    WIAT vs WJ III math reasoning comparison


    I have Developing Math Talent and a similiar frustration - they use Explore results but not SCAT results - it isn't that I can't extrapolate some, but showing it to the school and trying to explain why they should use the recommendations when the numbers are not right there in front of them is an entirely different thing.

    Looks like we will go with WJ anyway, as a friend who is a psychologist locally says she thinks it is probably more widely known/accepted.

    Cat

    Last edited by Catalana; 03/13/10 07:19 AM.

    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Treating children with Autism using leucovorin?
    by Eagle Mum - 06/05/25 03:50 PM
    What do I ask for to support my kids?
    by merfy - 06/05/25 12:01 AM
    Quotations that resonate with gifted people
    by indigo - 06/04/25 05:45 AM
    SENG Gifted Conference 2025
    by indigo - 06/03/25 09:36 AM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5