I didn't want to threadjack Mam's discussion about testing, so I'm starting fresh.
Our son's teacher gives timed math drills each morning -- a sheet of 100 problems that must be completed within 4 minutes @ 90% accuracy in order to pass. Scoring <90 or >4 minutes requires the student to write missed/incomplete problems five times each (or more for repeated failure).
Needless to say, the kids have one heck of an incentive to learn their facts, and to get fast at them, too.
HOWEVER, after reading the above article, I'm wondering if these speed drills aren't having a negative affect on him -- not so much in the way the article describes, but still negative. He's comfortably passed every test since day one, and is getting faster & faster at it, racing not only against the clock, but also against a couple of the other kids in his class.
Could these speed drills be thwarting our efforts in getting him to slow the &*&%@ down on everything else he's doing?
I'm a HUGE fan of the drill in general, believing that developing automaticity is very important and that it contributes to success with mathematics. But I think the daily emphasis on speed, and the fact that the kids treat it as an important competition, is conditioning our son to worry too much about how fast he is.
Without a doubt, his speediness was an asset on the WISC-IV, where he scored 144 for processing, as well as the WJ-III, where he scored between 144 and 194(!) on the fluency (timed) subtests.
But nevertheless, we are constantly pulling our hair out trying to get him to SLOW DOWN, as his speed too often results in careless mistakes.
Now... I come here for everyone's honesty, so if I am over-reaching -- tell me so. I don't want to micromanage the teacher's business. But if getting a "pass" on these daily tests will help relax my son even just a tad, I think it would be a win in my book.
Should I ask the teacher to eliminate these daily speed drills for our son?