As I'm re-reviewing Todd McIntyre's presentation (good prep material, BTW), I'm starting to wonder if we should contact the gifted teacher coordinating this as you suggest and if so, what's the best tact.
Things are starting to click right now on why we're going right to the GIEP after getting the school pysch report. From Todd's presentation:
Common Misconceptions
The GWR Determines �Giftedness�.
It doesn�t. The Gifted IEP Team makes that decision based on information contained in the GWR, but does so by looking at the child in relation to the regular, unmodified curriculum.
A student who is �gifted� in relation to his or her peers, might not be �gifted � in need of specially designed instruction� IF their district�s regular education program, left unmodified, provides them with an education of meaningful benefit. [JB: *we* say it doesn't]
�Gifted� identification in this context is dependent on the curriculum�s ability to meet the needs of the child. The GIEP Team decides that issue.
This is someone else's presentation (
www.appliedgifteded.com) but he typically has his facts down.
So what I take away from this is the fact that technically we're not ID'd as gifted UNTIL we go to this GIEP meeting and that is decided. Once that is decided, we will get the issues of PLEP and so on.
In a long winded way, what I am saying is that I am concerned if I ask upfront for the PLEP information (as Todd recommends) would that have a negative effect on the meeting from the outset?
Right now I am inclined to take a wait and see approach and then at the meeting politely start to raise these issues. Sadly, I have written off this year. We're really working for
next year and the year after that. I'm trying to keep the long view in mind.
JB