The difference between Verbal and both Nonverbal and Spatial on the DAS-II is fairly notable, and does suggest something is happening. A bit of it, though, could be related to the identified tracking and convergence problems, rather than actual fluid or spatial reasoning deficits.
His achievement scores are slightly higher than would be predicted by his DAS-II Verbal (which is likely the best available measure of his cognitive potential, at the moment), in all but oral reading fluency (which I believe you have listed as total oral fluency), spelling, written expression, mathematics composite, and numerical operations. These five are within expectations. (Oral reading fluency includes the two subscores: oral fluency rate, and oral fluency accuracy, which are so different--one above, and one below expectations--that I suspect he raced through it, sacrificing accuracy for speed. Plus this would be a prime place for tracking issues to strike.)
Yes, vision and attention could affect his scores. Also, he's still very young. Being six could affect his scores.

It is possible there is an additional learning difference involved (such as NVLD), but until the ADHD and (especially) tracking/convergence issues are addressed, it will be difficult to tease out whether it can all be explained by those two, or if there is something else going on. The frequent redirection could be a reflection of dysregulated attention, or it might have been because he was being asked to do tasks that challenged his tracking, handwriting, etc. Was there any indication of whether the need for redirection was uniform across all tasks, increased with time elapsed (general fatigue), increased/decreased for certain kinds of tasks, etc.?
There are quite a few families experienced with vision issues, so I'll leave that part of your question to them.