Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 195 guests, and 11 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    Gingtto, SusanRoth, Ellajack57, emarvelous, Mary Logan
    11,426 Registered Users
    April
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4 5 6
    7 8 9 10 11 12 13
    14 15 16 17 18 19 20
    21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    28 29 30
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 2 of 2 1 2
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 1,432
    Q
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    Q
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 1,432
    That is actually reasonable. Assuming that you start competing in 6th grade, 1000 hours translate to an average 3.2 hours per week over 6 years.

    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 1,432
    Q
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    Q
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 1,432
    One of my points to the coach was that DS is already doing math in school so I have not been inclined to push more math time on top of that except for maybe immediately prior to a competition. I have to say that 4 hours per day of math sounds like an awful lot to me. At our public middle school (should be similar in high school as well), DS spends 4 hours per week in math class plus about 1 hour per week on math homework so 5 hours per week total.

    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 1,432
    Q
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    Q
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 1,432
    Wow, 10 hours a week seems high for training for competitions prior to high school!

    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 1,432
    Q
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    Q
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 1,432
    That's my understanding as well regarding the various levels from AMC to AIME to MOSP to IMO.

    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 1,432
    Q
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    Q
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 1,432
    Your input is always useful! DS is probably averaging about an hour a week although he is not at a top 100 level nationally for early high school. I would think that around top 100 nationally at the early high school level probably approaches that turning point as RE commitment for many kids. It does appear that in the U.S. as well, you don't need to know more stuff until probably MOSP. I definitely agree that it shouldn't be presented as a "must" but as a logical option if he wants to improve.

    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 1,432
    Q
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    Q
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 1,432
    There's definitely plenty of time to decide whether and/or when to ramp up his commitment. Partly I wanted to make sure that he thinks things through and have realistic expectations as re options moving forward. Aside from the AMCs (8 and 10) and Math Olympiads, DS has done several tournaments, including Math 24 Integers and our regional equivalent of Stanford Math Tournament (we are not in CA).

    Last edited by Quantum2003; 04/10/15 10:05 PM.
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 1,432
    Q
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    Q
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 1,432
    I have heard that part of the problem with Mathcounts is that the ceiling is too low so that especially in a competitive state, the top 4 may not necessarily be stronger mathematically than the next 8. It also sometimes comes down to who can slam that buzzer a fraction of a second faster.

    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 1,432
    Q
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    Q
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 1,432
    Congratulations on qualifying for AIME. It does appear that 6th graders (plus the included 5th graders) generally don't do that well on the AIME. I wonder if it is partly a preparation issue.

    Joined: Nov 2011
    Posts: 280
    M
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Nov 2011
    Posts: 280
    Originally Posted by Quantum2003
    I have heard that part of the problem with Mathcounts is that the ceiling is too low so that especially in a competitive state, the top 4 may not necessarily be stronger mathematically than the next 8. It also sometimes comes down to who can slam that buzzer a fraction of a second faster.

    Many states, perhaps even most, do not use the Countdown round to determine who qualifies for nationals in MathCounts.

    Page 2 of 2 1 2

    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Technology may replace 40% of jobs in 15 years
    by indigo - 04/30/24 12:27 AM
    NAGC Tip Sheets
    by indigo - 04/29/24 08:36 AM
    Employers less likely to hire from IVYs
    by Wren - 04/29/24 03:43 AM
    Beyond IQ: The consequences of ignoring talent
    by Eagle Mum - 04/21/24 03:55 PM
    Testing with accommodations
    by blackcat - 04/17/24 08:15 AM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5