0 members (),
176
guests, and
18
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,428
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,428 |
DD is doing Common Core grade 6 math in grade 5. It appears to be pre-algebra. Distinct change from previous years with emphasis on abstract thinking, not operations.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,489
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,489 |
IMO if they weren't going to be in Geometry by 8th grade I'm not sure how gifted they really are. Some may say this conflates giftedness with opportunity. Possibly the example of Geometry by 8th grade is predicated on a student placed at grade-level with chronological age peers, then subject accelerated in math, therefore taking Geometry at age 13-14 (if red-shirted, age 14-15). Two things to the top quote, that by a quick scan I can't figure out who said. This depends on what material the 'Geometry' includes. It's arbitrary to say they aren't gifted if they can't at least take Geometry. The Geometry class as you took it in H.S. a generation ago, the Geometry class my son took in 8th grade, the new Common Core 'aligned' geometry class. I keep saying this like a broken record, but Common Core redefines what curriculum is in "geometry", and what is in Algebra I, and what 8th grade math looks like. And if you look back in history, you can't say that kids 30 years ago weren't gifted because they weren't in Geometry in 8th, when it often wasn't available. Giftedness is not defined by by knowing certain material by a certain age. Just because my kid read at 3, doesn't mean that ALL gifted kids read by 3, or that those who don't aren't gifted in the language arts.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,273 Likes: 12
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,273 Likes: 12 |
This depends on what material the 'Geometry' includes. It's arbitrary to say they aren't gifted if they can't at least take Geometry. The Geometry class as you took it in H.S. a generation ago, the Geometry class my son took in 8th grade, the new Common Core 'aligned' geometry class. I keep saying this like a broken record, but Common Core redefines what curriculum is in "geometry", and what is in Algebra I, and what 8th grade math looks like.
And if you look back in history, you can't say that kids 30 years ago weren't gifted because they weren't in Geometry in 8th, when it often wasn't available. Giftedness is not defined by by knowing certain material by a certain age. Just because my kid read at 3, doesn't mean that ALL gifted kids read by 3, or that those who don't aren't gifted in the language arts. Well said. A quick shortcut is to click on the [Re: XXXXXX] in the top frame of the post ( in this case, it was [ Re: nicoledad] and the quote came from the last sentence in that post).
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 249
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 249 |
Here's the info from our HS.
Math Scope and Sequence Information—SPRING 2014
The information provided below is for parents and students to become familiar with the typical progression of math courses from 9th grade through 12th grade at ----- High School.
Although our goal is to provide students with the most challenging curriculum in math, it should be noted that the acceleration of math is provided for those students who are developmentally ready.
All parents/guardians are encouraged to become familiar with the math courses available at -----Middle School, ---- Middle School and -----High School. The following table represents a typical continuum of math classes for our High School.
Regular Track: 6th grade 7th grade 8th grade 9th grade - Algebra I 10th grade - Geometry 11th grade - Mathematical model/ Algebra II 12th grade - Algebra II/ Pre Calculus/ Statistics Accelerated Track: 6th - 6th and some 7th 7th- 7th and 8th 8th- Algebra I 9th- Geometry 10th- Algebra II 11th- PreCal 12th- AP Calculus AB or Ap Statistics
Gifted Tracks (USED TO BE) 6th- 7th and 8th 7th- Algebra I 8th- Geometry 9th- Algebra II 10th- Pre AP Calculus/ Ap Statistics 11th- AP Calculus AB 12th- AP Calculus BC
But starting next year, Gifted track will become the same sequence as accelerated except called TAG class and more in depth (supposedly). Here's more excerpt from the school website:
Four years of high school math and science are required for graduation with endorsements. The math credits must include Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II, and one other Advanced Math class (as defined by TEA : Precalculus, Statistics, AP Statistics).
Most colleges and universities expect students to be taking math of increasing rigor through their senior year of high school. Therefore, college-bound students who qualify and choose to take Algebra I in middle school should plan to take advantage of additional math courses available their senior year of high school. If a math class is not taken in the senior year, the student will be at a disadvantage when entering college and colleges will want an explanation.
Information for parents/guardians to consider:
• Concurrent Enrollment and Dual Credit (Early College Start) ~ Juniors and Seniors only. Students must apply to the university on their own, provide their own transportation, and there is no guarantee that students will be able to coordinate a university class with the high school schedule. Classes may be available through ---- Community College.
• High school classes ~ Students who move rapidly through the math curricula will be in high school courses with older and, perhaps, more mature students. The highest level calculus class offered in high school is AP Calculus BC. If a student takes this calculus class before their senior year, they cannot take the next calculus class in the sequence until their freshman year in college.
• Rapid pace ~ Many people have expressed concerns about the rapid pace of the accelerated math program and have expressed concerns about the emotional and developmental appropriateness of students in the program. Their concerns are very valid. However, for the exceptionally talented student who is highly motivated in math, research is available in support of acceleration. With new mathematics TEKS being introduced beginning in Fall 2014, acceleration should be undertaken with extreme caution to avoid gaps in knowledge and skills. There is no substitute for time, practice and repeated exposure to content to solidify mathematical skills and concepts.
---------------------------------------------------- In the nutshell, they are decelerating gifted track students. This is the HS that have 40-50 NMS scholars a year. They leave the door ajar by mentioning exceptionally talented students so we see what happens when we get there.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,273 Likes: 12
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,273 Likes: 12 |
Sadly, this is the universal story. Based on what is reported as occurring in some districts, some may predict that when the "repeated exposure to content" is not well-received by "exceptionally talented students", the district may call for further deceleration as the remedy.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,489
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,489 |
In the nutshell, they are decelerating gifted track students. This is the HS that have 40-50 NMS scholars a year. They leave the door ajar by mentioning exceptionally talented students so we see what happens when we get there. Are they going to continue to offer AP Calculus BC for the top level kids? If so the kids will get to the same place in the end. Most places I know ones takes AB or BC calc, not one then the other. And that is how the AP system sells the class. I was surprised to see the current Calculus sequence. The question is it enough for your kids? Will these TAG classes really be more difficult. My son would be happier if the classes he was taking had more proofs in them and did more abstract math. Even though it doesn't say anywhere in the document about Common Core, if you are in the US I suspect that is what is driving this. Is this a public school? If it is I'm very surprised by the 4 year math requirement. Their line about NEEDING 4 years of math to get into college is a little bit stretching it. IF you are going into STEM, yes.. And IF you want a top tier school, yes. But lots & lots of universities will accept students who's top math class is Algebra II.
Last edited by bluemagic; 12/04/14 02:27 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,080 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,080 Likes: 8 |
In some states, the line about needing four years of math to enter college is related to the entry requirements for public 4-years. Check what the matriculation requirements are for the state unis. While HS grad requirements generally are designed to meet or exceed the uni entry requirements, sometimes they add hoops that the unis don't need from you.
...pronounced like the long vowel and first letter of the alphabet...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,363
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,363 |
IMO if they weren't going to be in Geometry by 8th grade I'm not sure how gifted they really are. Some may say this conflates giftedness with opportunity. Possibly the example of Geometry by 8th grade is predicated on a student placed at grade-level with chronological age peers, then subject accelerated in math, therefore taking Geometry at age 13-14 (if red-shirted, age 14-15). Two things to the top quote, that by a quick scan I can't figure out who said. This depends on what material the 'Geometry' includes. It's arbitrary to say they aren't gifted if they can't at least take Geometry. The Geometry class as you took it in H.S. a generation ago, the Geometry class my son took in 8th grade, the new Common Core 'aligned' geometry class. I keep saying this like a broken record, but Common Core redefines what curriculum is in "geometry", and what is in Algebra I, and what 8th grade math looks like. And if you look back in history, you can't say that kids 30 years ago weren't gifted because they weren't in Geometry in 8th, when it often wasn't available. Giftedness is not defined by by knowing certain material by a certain age. Just because my kid read at 3, doesn't mean that ALL gifted kids read by 3, or that those who don't aren't gifted in the language arts. ITA - very well said  I'll also add - and I won't say this happens anywhere else because I can only speak for where I'm at - but here opportunity knocks more often in higher SES schools, *especially* in the early elementary years where parental involvement in the school and in children's lives can make a huge impact. polarbear
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,432
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,432 |
Our district adopted CC but thankfully chose to pass on the combined Algebra/Geometry sequences. I think it would be nearly impossible for late acceleration under that model.
Both arguments for and against late acceleration(7th & later) have merits for different reasons. On the one hand, it is far more practical to accelerate in elementary before you hit Algebra I. You really want every concept/procedure from Algebra I onward to be completely solid rather than "easy come easy go" so I would personally hesitate about "skipping" from Algebra I onward. On the other hand, many kids sail through elementary math and even Pre-Algebra but their advance ability or lack thereof only become apparent after they tackle Algebra. In that sense, it is logical to wait until they get to a level that actually measures more advance abilities before accelerating. Having said all this, these analyses don't necessary apply to "gifted" students BUT keep in mind that the accelerated tracks tend to be rather inclusive and aren't normally reserved for technically "gifted" students. Oftentimes, you have to come up with guidelines that fit the top 25% (or more) rather than the top 2%.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,273 Likes: 12
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,273 Likes: 12 |
"skipping" from Algebra I onward Some may say that compacting would generally be the form of math acceleration in the scenarios under discussion, not "skipping" per se. The material is taught at a more rapid pace, avoiding the mind-numbing repetition which is said to cause many gifted students to disengage and underachieve. A compacted class may also move more rapidly by not having to wait for students who are not ready for the challenge of the coursework, to catch up. Compacted classes, where available, may provide appropriate curriculum and pacing for gifted students.
|
|
|
|
|