0 members (),
217
guests, and
115
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,081 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,081 Likes: 8 |
People may also have different presentations or manifestations of the same types of talents, which may be more easily recognized or acknowledged in some cultural contexts than in others.
...pronounced like the long vowel and first letter of the alphabet...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,898
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,898 |
Exactly; it's complicated. But for as long as we have good evidence that people are judged to a significant extent on the pure basis of whether they are male or female, I'm not going to devote mental energy to wondering about those things, personally.
Email: my username, followed by 2, at google's mail
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,181 |
People may also have different presentations or manifestations of the same types of talents, which may be more easily recognized or acknowledged in some cultural contexts than in others. I think that this is it, actually. DD has noted that the ONE constant in her research observations of human subjects in pairs programming is that the male paired subjects tend to be OVER-confident, and the female ones UNDER confident. If anything, their data suggests that the female teams are less error-prone and work faster when they work as a cohesive team. She finds this fascinating, btw. She's observed it anecdotally, too-- that her friends (mostly male) who are all STEM geeks, and most of them guys, tend to view her more self-effacing approach as a lack of ability rather than a lack of brashness/bravado-- all other things being equal, I mean, and her class rank/transcripts certainly show that if anything, she's MORE than equal. KWIM? She has speculated to me that one explanation for the paucity of female professionals in some fields (engineering and CS in particular) may be the result of business managers that reward particular personality characteristics, rather than true "talent."
Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,453
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,453 |
She finds this fascinating, btw. She's observed it anecdotally, too-- that her friends (mostly male) who are all STEM geeks, and most of them guys, tend to view her more self-effacing approach as a lack of ability rather than a lack of brashness/bravado-- all other things being equal, I mean, and her class rank/transcripts certainly show that if anything, she's MORE than equal. KWIM? I think this applies across cultures too in that I find that Europeans and Far Eastern Asians (and to a lesser extent Americans) are far less likely to gauge their skills as excellent and that the ones that do are excellent. Whereas I have personally experienced (and have compared notes with colleagues that have had the same experience) offshore resources not only outright lying on their resumes but also self rating themselves much higher than they objectively turn out to be.
Last edited by madeinuk; 06/25/14 04:04 PM.
Become what you are
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 199
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 199 |
I think this applies across cultures too in that I find that Europeans and Far Eastern Asians (and to a lesser extent Americans) are far less likely to gauge their skills as excellent and that the ones that do are excellent. Whereas I have personally experienced (and have compared notes with colleagues that have had the same experience) offshore resources not only outright lying on their resumes but also self rating themselves much higher than they objectively turn out to be. The cases where I run into that are usually from folks in countries where to be poor is terrifying, and they need to make themselves stand out. (to be poor in America is nothing like to be poor in one of those countries) Frankly, there are some countries that to be "poor" is terrifying and right at their doorsteps, and from what I have seen, it is folks from those countries that uses STEM careers - male and female - to escape either their hometown, family pressures put on them and/or poverty.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,641 Likes: 3
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,641 Likes: 3 |
There have been many more tech companies founded by men than women. Paul Graham, essayist and co-founder of the successful incubator YCombinator, says that more boys than girls take a strong interest in programming from a young age, causing there to be many more 20-year-old male than female hackers. I don't think there is a sex difference in access to computers and the Internet. It's a matter of interest. https://www.theinformation.com/YC-s-Paul-Graham-The-Complete-InterviewYC’s Paul Graham: The Complete Interview December 26, 2013 Does YC discriminate against female founders?
I'm almost certain that we don't discriminate against female founders because I would know from looking at the ones we missed. You could argue that we should do more, that we should encourage women to start startups.
The problem with that is I think, at least with technology companies, the people who are really good technology founders have a genuine deep interest in technology. In fact, I've heard startups say that they did not like to hire people who had only started programming when they became CS majors in college.
If someone was going to be really good at programming they would have found it on their own. Then if you go look at the bios of successful founders this is invariably the case, they were all hacking on computers at age 13. What that means is the problem is 10 years upstream of us. If we really wanted to fix this problem, what we would have to do is not encourage women to start startups now.
It's already too late. What we should be doing is somehow changing the middle school computer science curriculum or something like that. God knows what you would do to get 13 year old girls interested in computers. I would have to stop and think about that.
How can you tell whether you are discriminating against women?
You can tell what the pool of potential startup founders looks like. There's a bunch of ways you can do it. You can go on Google and search for audience photos of PyCon, for example, which is this big Python conference.
That's a self-selected group of people. Anybody who wants to apply can go to that thing. They're not discriminating for or against anyone. If you want to see what a cross section of programmers looks like, just go look at that or any other conference, doesn't have to be PyCon specifically.
Or you could look at commits in open source projects. Once again self-selected, these people don't even meet in person. It's all by email, no one can be intimidated by or feel like an outcast for something like that.
Ok, yes, women aren't set up to be startup founders at the level we want. What would be lost if Y Combinator was more proactive about it?
No, the problem is these women are not by the time get to 23...Like Mark Zuckerberg starts programming, starts messing about with computers when he's like 10 or whatever. By the time he's starting Facebook he's a hacker, and so he looks at the world through hacker eyes. That's what causes him to start Facebook. We can't make these women look at the world through hacker eyes and start Facebook because they haven't been hacking for the past 10 years.
It is changing a bit because it's no longer so critical to be a hacker. The nature of startups is changing. It used to be that all startups were mostly technology companies. Now you have things like the Gilt Groupe where they're really retailers, and that's what they have to be good at because the technology is more commoditized.
That's probably why we have more female founders than we used to in the past, because the nature of the startups that they're working on is different. You don't have to be a hardcore hacker to start a startup like you might have had to be 20 years ago. It's partly software eating world, and partly that there's just more infrastructure.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,299 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,299 Likes: 2 |
Bostonian, you're still making a correlation- causation assumption that hasn't been proven.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1 |
Paul Graham isn't a social scientist. His arguments assume there isn't systemic, implicit gender bias based on cultural attitudes and that major competitions access the potential, not realized, pool of "best" talent.
One need only look at Disney, Nickelodeon, or walk through the aisles of a toy or bookstore to witness rampant stereotyping. Case in point: the nauseating toy for "girl engineers", Goldie Blox, a single-purpose toy bedecked in pink accoutrements and accompanied by a vapid story-come-manual featuring a visually sexualized protagonist. This patronizing pith has been lauded as a breakthrough toy. The only thing it shatters is girls' self-esteem.
As a society, we excel at subliminally undermining females' intellects. Young women are bombarded with messaging from all corners promoting a hyper-sexualized, objectified existence. Level playing field, I think not.
I attended an all-girls school from grade 7, and the single best thing they did was EXPECT that all graduates would have a full slate of university preparation math and science courses under their belts. They created an environment where female STEM participation was normative. I tip my hat to the headmistress at the time.
What is to give light must endure burning.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,856 |
I think Paul Graham is simply taking note of the problem without making any evaluations as to its cause: girls are largely turned off from programming by the time they're 13. The cause has been largely discussed here already: social bias.
These gender biases are not presented to our DD9 from her family, but she's constantly exposed to them nonetheless, and I'm constantly having to provide counter-messaging in response. I consider it a victory that DD recently decided it was okay to like blue. One question I get with some regularity which displays the insecurities she's getting from society regarding gender: "Dad, do you wish I'd been born a boy?"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,513 Likes: 1 |
What is to give light must endure burning.
|
|
|
|
|