Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 118 guests, and 26 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    the social space, davidwilly, Jessica Lauren, Olive Dcoz, Anant
    11,557 Registered Users
    December
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7
    8 9 10 11 12 13 14
    15 16 17 18 19 20 21
    22 23 24 25 26 27 28
    29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 13 of 36 1 2 11 12 13 14 15 35 36
    Joined: Feb 2010
    Posts: 2,640
    Likes: 2
    B
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    B
    Joined: Feb 2010
    Posts: 2,640
    Likes: 2
    Originally Posted by Dude
    Originally Posted by Bostonian
    Originally Posted by aquinas
    I predict we'll see student debt securitized by major and class, with differential rates of return by area of study, region.
    I support this, but such lending is crowded out by the current system of government-guaranteed loans, which charges all students the same rates and effectively gives the largest subsidies (the difference between a market interest rate and the government interest rate) to the worst students who study the most impractical subjects.

    I don't see how financing student debt at significantly higher interest rates is a practical solution to excessive education costs.
    Artificially low mortgage interest rates contributed to a housing bubble. Raising student loan interest rates to a level reflecting their credit risk would exert downward pressure on college costs, since many people would not be able to borrow as much.

    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,299
    Likes: 2
    Val Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,299
    Likes: 2
    Originally Posted by Bostonian
    Artificially low mortgage interest rates contributed to a housing bubble. Raising student loan interest rates to a level reflecting their credit risk would exert downward pressure on college costs, since many people would not be able to borrow as much.

    Perhaps, but I think the real problem there was that credit was too easy to get. This situation led to too many people buying a house, and the effects on pricing were predictable.

    But of course, that's not a problem with a college education. It's not like this society encourages everyone to go to college and hands out loans like they were lollipops.

    Oh, wait....

    Joined: Dec 1969
    Posts: 272
    M
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Dec 1969
    Posts: 272
    Hello everyone - just a reminder to please keep it respectful in this thread.

    Best,
    Mark

    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 5,181
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 5,181
    Originally Posted by Bostonian
    Originally Posted by aquinas
    I predict we'll see student debt securitized by major and class, with differential rates of return by area of study, region.
    I support this, but such lending is crowded out by the current system of government-guaranteed loans, which charges all students the same rates and effectively gives the largest subsidies (the difference between a market interest rate and the government interest rate) to the worst students who study the most impractical subjects.

    You do know that the cap on government-backed student loans is just 11K annually, for a combination of student (Stafford) and parent (PLUS) loans, right? And that you're into "unsecured debt" territory already as soon as you are borrowing to cover what an institution THINKS you can write a check for rather than considers "need" for your household...



    Remind me what tuition is up to at Stanford, again? How about out of state tuition at UW?



    The students who wind up (or their parents do) with 50, 60, or 100K in debt didn't get there with government subsidy.



    Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 2,007
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 2,007
    Originally Posted by Val
    Perhaps, but I think the real problem there was that credit was too easy to get. This situation led to too many people buying a house, and the effects on pricing were predictable.

    Standard issue credit bubble.

    Fortunately, we were able to mitigate the fallout by poofing a bajillion dollars into existence.

    Law schools certainly aren't being backstopped by the Fed and demand is collapsing.

    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 2,856
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 2,856
    Originally Posted by Bostonian
    Artificially low mortgage interest rates contributed to a housing bubble. Raising student loan interest rates to a level reflecting their credit risk would exert downward pressure on college costs, since many people would not be able to borrow as much.

    There's minimal risk to the lender, because educational debt cannot be discharged in a bankruptcy. That makes this an attractive can't-miss investment opportunity. Any (minimal) risks can be offset by insurance and default swap purchases.

    Plus, tuition can only go up!

    Sound familiar?

    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 2,007
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 2,007
    Originally Posted by Dude
    There's minimal risk to the lender, because educational debt cannot be discharged in a bankruptcy. That makes this an attractive can't-miss investment opportunity. Any (minimal) risks can be offset by insurance and default swap purchases.

    Plus, tuition can only go up!

    Sound familiar?

    You cannot properly apply the topography of a stock market, housing, credit, or tulip bubble to higher education.

    Why?

    Because it is not a commodity that can be traded and bid up.

    There is some sort of inane illogical economic topography in higher education, but it is not that of a bubble.

    This mechanism has already reversed for law school, which may or may not be a bellwether for the rest of the higher education system.

    The decline in law school applications was caused by a recognition by an increasing number prospective law students that law school is not a good investment, partially due to an increase in actual transparency regarding employment prospects.

    The supply of credit for law school remains effectively infinite.

    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 2,007
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 2,007
    Here's an example of actual cuts in tuition due to lack of demand for a law degree:

    http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/u_of_iowa_to_cut_tuition_for_law_students_by_16.4_percent/

    I'm using law school here as an example of higher education in general because it's the clearest and biggest example of higher education contraction that I've seen so far.

    So, cost *can* decline.

    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 2,856
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 2,856
    Originally Posted by JonLaw
    So, cost *can* decline.

    Well, naturally. You could have found prior evidence that housing costs can decline, too, you just wouldn't have heard that very often in 2005.

    Most economists are so caught up in crunching abstruse numbers, searching for predictive power in indices, benchmarks, and test levels, that they forget that they're actually trying to predict the completely unpredictable, because at the very base of its nature the market is made up of people, and therefore has a psychology, so sometimes it just goes bleeping nuts.

    Two things that people are often unprepared to shop for in a rational way are medical care and their children's futures. Not coincidentally, the prices on those two things are currently running out of control.

    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 2,856
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 2,856
    Originally Posted by JonLaw
    You cannot properly apply the topography of a stock market, housing, credit, or tulip bubble to higher education.

    Why?

    Because it is not a commodity that can be traded and bid up.

    No, an education cannot be traded.

    A loan, on the other hand, can be bought, sold, traded, and for extra fun, securitized.

    Page 13 of 36 1 2 11 12 13 14 15 35 36

    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    No gifted program in school
    by Anant - 12/19/24 05:58 PM
    Gifted Conference Index
    by ickexultant - 12/04/24 06:05 PM
    Gift ideas 12-year-old who loves math, creating
    by Eagle Mum - 11/29/24 06:18 PM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5