@knute
Yes, we are in CO.

Question, how do you determine "substantially limits"? Part of their argument for not even providing an IEP is because dd#2 is progressing and not far enough behind so they feel she is accessing the curriculum in the classroom.
I don't trust their judgement at this point for a variety of reasons. First, dd's teacher last year came into the initial meeting concerned about dd's math abilities. However, after their testing and their determination that she didn't qualify for an IEP/504 I didn't hear any further about the teacher's concerns.
Secondly, prior to this same meeting in February her teacher had her assessed at a DRA level of 21. Then while the school did their own testing (in addition to the testing done by Children's who diagnosed her with dyslexia), the teacher retested her DRA at 28 (keeping in mind this was dd's second year in 2nd grade). I personally didn't see such a big jump in improvement from dd. I don't know how DRA assessments work but I question the testing. While dd can read, her comprehension is poor (especially when reading orally), she is not very accurate (skips words and lines), and the more words there are on the page the worse she does. If it is a long book/story she can seem to infer meaning fairly well. But when it's short sentences/directions in math she struggles. We usually have to read the directions and story problems on her math homework because when she reads them 'it doesn't make sense'.
Also, the school doesn't seem to want to acknowledge the results from Children's and are relying solely on their results.