I read that the early reading may be giftedness, esp. if self taught (which he did). At the same time, I've also read that reading abilities, when compared to other kids, may 'even' out in the later elementary years so someone who is 'gifted' now in reading won't necessarily be considered that later.
I think both are true. But remember that you aren't looking at IQ scores, you are looking at achievement testing scores. And you aren't looking at 'even across the board' types of achievement, you are looking at one particular area.
What I'm saying is that the tests are great if they clearly show what is going on. In this particular situation I don't think the test is able to show what is going on. Would the school administer an IQ test?
Clearly self teaching to read at 3 is gifted-behavior. I would keep my mind open to the possibility that 'gifted' is part of the mix, 2E is certainly a possibility, and keep documenting what I was seeing.
Have you read?
http://www.hoagiesgifted.org/gifted_101.htmAt age 6 the WISC IV becomes an option, so start saving up for it and looking around for who you would hire to do it. SB-5 is an option right now if you can find someone to do it for you. I think testing is a great idea if you
don't end up paying out of pocket for a WPPSI-III. It's fine if the school wants to do one, but I would rather wait than pay for one - the ceilings are just too low for a kid who self-taught reading at 3.
Love and More love,
Grinity
