Pandora, sorry I got off track. Back to the scores, if your main question is whether they indicate giftedness, yes they look gifted to me the non-expert. That's quite a high VCI. 130 (for FSIQ or GAI, depending) counts as gifted under many/most situations, though some school programs may have lower cutoffs so as not to miss people (and other private programs dealing with HG and PG individuals exclusively may have higher cutoffs.) My main concern would be what happened with the PRI - it seems inconsistent with the VCI - that's where I'd be worried about some random LD getting in the way of the scores. Any interesting variations in the subtests that comprise PRI? I also think the big difference between the PRI and the achievement scores may indicate something - I wish I knew what.

It's great that the achievement scores are in a gifted range, though they aren't entirely consistent with the much higher VCI either (but maybe that's due to the bottleneck effects of the lower PS and WM? thinking out loud).

Hmmm, this is interesting - maybe this is what the tester was getting at about the scores - apparentlyh it's common for GAI > FSIQ for persons with conditions like Aspergers (though that's quite a list of conditions) http://www.pearsonpsychcorp.com.au/userfiles/509624557WAIS4_TIM_revised.pdf

Have vision issues already been ruled out as well, since they are common amongst kids with other sensory-motor issues? (just more thinking out loud...) Do you need scores to get into a particular program or are you just trying to figure out giftedness to make sure his educational needs are being met more generally?