I was thinking of Gilman's Academic Advocacy book and Assouline & Lupkowski-Shoplik's Developing Math Talent. The Developing Math Talent book indicates that WJ isn't detailed enough to plan math programming, but it at least *mentions* the WJ (WIAT not mentioned even). Academic Advocacy uses WJ in most examples, I think.
If you know of any with WIAT examples, please let me know! I'm wishing I knew what to suggest/insist.
Here's the links I mentioned before:
WIAT (II? III?) to WJ III numerical ops and
WIAT vs WJ III math reasoning comparisonI have Developing Math Talent and a similiar frustration - they use Explore results but not SCAT results - it isn't that I can't extrapolate some, but showing it to the school and trying to explain why they should use the recommendations when the numbers are not right there in front of them is an entirely different thing.
Looks like we will go with WJ anyway, as a friend who is a psychologist locally says she thinks it is probably more widely known/accepted.
Cat
