Our school-administered DAS-II at age 9 gave a mildly gifted, very even profile.
Our privately-administered WISC-IV at age 11 gave a DYS-level GAI with a processing speed in the 90's, like 35th %ile, as I recall.
Obviously, these are very very different, and point to different paths for helping DD. Most experts seem to like the DAS-II but for us it really didn't help clarify what was going on. Some of the difference may have been due to changes in DD, of course, but even at the time the DAS-II profile didn't make sense. I hate to think the school psych deliberately botched the administration, but what does that leave?
Whatever you choose, if the results make no sense, question their relevance.
