This is needlessly rude, indigo.
What is rude in pointing out that a resource may be shared without discrediting another resource/author?
DeeDee is an experienced 2E parent who is providing valuable information.
Yes, DeeDee has provided the titles of two books and a website, and I did not discredit them.
Meanwhile some may also value the information which I provided, including the resources which were posted to begin this thread; Resources which DeeDee chose to discredit.
Although DeeDee did not like the resources with which I began this thread, the content of the resources which she provided seems to present the same/similar information which she previously termed
inappropriate stereotypes, in relation to resources which I posted.
I have sought clarification as to what causes DeeDee to discredit one resource, while praising another which seems to present same/similar content.
There is no problem with politely disagreeing, which she has done.
May I politely disagree? My experience suggests that one may share a resource without attempting to discredit another resource or author as she did.
Between the resources I posted to start the thread, which DeeDee discredited, and the resources which DeeDee posted, there seems to be a difference without a distinction. Inquiring as to the differences she perceives did not yield factual information, only statements about "separating wheat and chaff", "resources that appear to have value and credibility".
