It's possible that the report was a standard report with changes for your child. Because report writers have to write so many reports, they often include standard sections modified for each child (e.g., including specific scores, describing particularly important impressions, etc.). I'm not disparaging the reports; it is just the reality of writing many reports.
My son had developmental delays (now advanced) and I have found all sorts of little gems (e.g., saying he was on a playground when he was indoors and saying he was tested after lunch when he was tested in the morning).
I wouldn't read much into it; the scores are more important. Definitely ask if it bothers you, but those terms are technical terms for particular scores (not personal impressions) and the scores themselves matter more. It was probably at least partially an error, although your daughter may have had above average for scores that weren't reported (like working memory).
I agree that is it worth knowing the working memory and processing speed scores.
Last edited by apm221; 05/28/14 06:29 AM.
