I'm a bit confused they seem to be using the log from the old style tests - hg >145 but the tests they mention as qualifiers are newer one which would make their minimum criteria the same as Davidson or top 0.01 %. I didn't read more than the first few pages though because I find bullet points hard tto read for more than that.
Or maybe they are just applying extended norms for the very top. I think it is just that I am confused about this in general. Everybody says "it is not like his IQ is 200 is it?" he'll be fine and unless they understand stats it is a bit hard to explain.
Last edited by puffin; 10/14/13 09:34 PM.
