How about a 7th grader who has already taken geometry "competing" on the SAT against a 7th grader who has not? Does the first have an unfair advantage?
Or the student who participates in AMC & similar math endeavors and is therefor exposed to problem solving strategies & practice that others are not? Unfair advantage?
Or the student whose classroom teacher includes SAT mini-drills as part of the regular curriculum... unfair?
If my child doesn't benefit from any of the above, yet curls up with a "test-prep" book of some sort, how is that any different?
That's why I said that there's no clear line.
I'd argue that (for me, just my personal opinion) that the third of those is really the only one where I think things are edging into questionable territory.
Anything child-led is obviously not "prepping" in that sense, and the first two are not being done solely in service to elevation of test scores.
KWIM?
