The charts in the Hoagies page make no sense to me.
I do not get why the LOG should be different for the
SB5 and the WISC/WIPPS (with no extended norms). Aren't
they based on the same idea of a Gauss curve with 15
as the standard deviation ?
While it does not mean that the results are comparable
is *does* mean that is is just as rare to get 130 in each
test.
But according to the Hoagies' table this would put
you in the MG range for the WISC, but could put you
in the EG for the SB5. This seems nonsense to me.
135 will still be MG for WISC but could me PG for the
SB-5 ?? Again, nonsense.
Can someone clarify this ??
