She specifically told me that he didn't max out any of the subtests, so I'm assuming that she had a reason not to calculate the extended scores. I had to nudge her a little just to get the GAI, which is 8 points higher than his FSIQ.
I also wonder, as I always do, to what extent the relative weakness in processing is due to his relative weakness in writing, and of course there's the attention issue -- the processing portion of the test is a little less interesting, and his attention tends to drift pretty quickly with that type of mundane activity.
Nevertheless, I think this score is about right. He's very bright, but not the kind of 160+ kid who goes to college at 11 or 12.
Am I the only one in this forum who thinks of Sheldon from "Big Bang Theory" a lot when contemplating my child? I love that show.
