Tester described that as "doing very well", today's psych described that as "significant underachievement, she should be two years in advance with that IQ". Which explains my sense of denial.
Isn't it interesting how two different clinicians can have such different opinions from the same set of data? The psych who tested dd10 the second time also said that there were no concerns, no hints of 2e, and generally she was doing fine and that she was bright but nothing that far out of the ordinary. This was all despite having repeat 18s and 19s on the WISC (both times she was tested), scores ranging from 8-19, achievement scores that fluctuated all over the place, and with her generally performing like a high avg kid in school. Another psych, looking @ the same data & meeting with the same kid
, said that she was seriously underachieving & dx her with ADD and anxiety.
