But you are proving my point, aren’t you?
I’m sorry, I didn’t feel up to delving into that link you so thoughtfully provided. (Twobad nights with sick kid...ugh).

My point was that the criterion for recognition was NOT where the education systems in these countries place the transitions from general education/general STEM/targeted medical education and training at the ages of 16/18/20 or 22, with the UK and the US being at opposite ends of the spectrum. The criterion is these specialists’ medical education and training, and if the credentials they bring happen to be in the English language and acquired in education systems the Canadian body feels familiar with, you end up with this specific set of countries.






Last edited by Tigerle; 04/26/18 01:22 PM.